Rotector - Roblox Safety Warnings icon

Rotector - Roblox Safety Warnings

by jaxron

v2.15.0 Updated Mar 13, 2026 891KiB
CWS
10K
Users
β˜… 3.47
100 reviews
#1121
of 49.1K
tools
#202 of 12.2K
βœ…Recently updated

Description

Know who you're talking to on Roblox. Rotector displays safety indicators next to users across Roblox, showing potential risks before any interaction. Our system analyzes profiles, friend networks, group memberships, avatar outfits, and condo server activity to catch what traditional moderation misses. Color-coded status indicators appear on user profiles throughout Roblox: 🟠 Flagged - Currently under review πŸ”΄ Confirmed - Verified inappropriate behavior 🟑 Mixed - Concerning content but insufficient evidence 🟣 Past Offender - Previously flagged, since cleared Core Features: - Detailed tooltips with violation specifics, confidence scores, and evidence - Content blur for flagged users (names, descriptions, avatars) with click-to-reveal - Queue system to submit users for AI analysis (quick or thorough scans) - Community voting to verify flagging accuracy - Auto-translation of violation reasons into 24 languages - Report helper that pre-fills Roblox reports with violation details - Custom API support for third-party content analysis services - Statistics dashboard tracking flagged users and weekly activity NOTE: Flagged users are automatically restricted to viewing only their own status. This prevents bad actors from using the extension to scout for others or evade detection. *Independent safety tool - not affiliated with Roblox Corporation.*
Rotector - Roblox Safety Warnings screenshot 1Rotector - Roblox Safety Warnings screenshot 2Rotector - Roblox Safety Warnings screenshot 3Rotector - Roblox Safety Warnings screenshot 4Rotector - Roblox Safety Warnings screenshot 5

Reviews (30 cached)

β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†2026-03-22
Raylan Smith

Too many false positives. Great at people who actually do bad stuff but most info is outdated and lots of innocent people like me getting struck. 1 star.

β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†2026-03-22
St Peters Edgware

too many things fall under false positive just tested it with an alt, it does work majorly with flagging actual people who are breaking tos but there are also alot of innoecent people being hit in the crossfire, so 1 star it is

β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†2026-03-21
Zecdemise

Fix the ratelimit

β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†2026-03-20
AriBoo919

The rate limits are actually insane, like bro i just wanna filter my friends list 😭

β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†2026-03-13
Collin Bruder

The extension is mid-tier at best. It only shows results for people who get manually scanned by players. Scans are rate-limited to just 3 per day. It produces tons of false positives. It lets blatantly guilty people off the hook with lame excuses like "a friend did it." Appeal handling is terrible. Obviously guilty players get unmarked anyway. The system is unreliable overall. It wrongly flags innocent people. It creates massive loopholes for apex preds. It is run by an extremely immature staff team. They act like they're gods because of their trash AI-slop code.

β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†2026-03-13
funny

Broken

β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†2026-03-12
Lavel

Did a bit of diving into how this system works, in all fairness the condo stuff is marked true. The way the "access codes" they claim work, sometimes are not honeypot games, they're just you join the game and there's no access code, which i can attribute to the false flagging within this. (This is a rare circumstance so no need for any individuals to worry about this.) The main issue is the bias from moderation marking someone for "Other Reason". I have an alt that was marked for that and I do want to say, calling someone a PDF with no sufficient evidence or no resource-linked information is going to only discredit the data you displayed on the official website. I don't often receive much about old years long drama about "PDF" stuff, but honestly it's just edgy teenagers super similar to Ruben sim calling anybody who have participated in any disgusting activity pedophiles. I don't encourage disgusting behavior but the bias is only encouraging harassment towards possibly innocent individuals, or people who have moved on over the course of years. You can't run a platform for corporate as a immature or inexperienced collective of people. It takes work, and clearly there's obvious moderation bias, this isn't to discourage you but to make you understand that you can't do everything for a huge company. Which is why Rotector never became massive, it only became very specific for people who are obsessed with people and want to cause gossip or drama. End of story, that's the reality of it, I don't expect a response, and also I've moved towards more real life things and I still receive minimal harassment from some people. Don't be chronically online, and the actual degenerates who say they're looking to "protect the kids" using an extension running around claiming to be heroes. Both sides are in the wrong, from what I have seen.

β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†2026-03-06
Nothing None

hi im requesting the right to be forgotten on article 17

β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†2026-03-01
Thien Quan Nguyen

i think this extention is collecting people infomation which i dont like it without my permission

β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†2026-02-28
Secure Fallen

Wish I could upload images here but since I can't I'll just say that I severely doubt the accuracy of this extension. My friend was flagged for being in 3 condo servers. (solar (/####), ##/trlx yanko, Unknown Server), I got shocked because I'm a very close friend to this person. I immediately dm'd them on discord and asked them to screenshare, they did and showed that they were in zero of the servers (Keep in mind I didn't tell them why I was having them do this before they opened the screen share so there's no way they left the servers). Not only was this a false positive but on the direct statement of the api it said that it was reviewed by human moderators specifically by "anonymous" if a moderator can anonymously claim that someone was in 3 condo servers with zero proof and be entirely wrong it tells me that I can't trust this extension. I'd also like to say none of the servers had a join date, they all said Joined "unknown" updated "Nov 18 2025" each one of them said that. I can accept false positives but I can't accept false ANONYMOUS HUMAN REVIEWS of accounts, there should be ZERO false positives with human reviews.

β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†2026-02-06
Misa β€œMiiisa”

This feels like a AI fake service. I have seen my friends been flagged for inappropriate avatars, their outfit is just a girl with a skirt on. This info anyone gets from here isn't reliable and will never fully be. No one fully knows what everyone is doing. And i get this extension is meant to be for a great service but it just isn't providing that. Its making good people seem like unsafe people. And yes i get it might have gotten some pedophiles but that doesn't mean its 100% trustworthy. Its messed up to say people are unsafe due to their outfits, or what discord servers they are in. It doesn't automatically make them a pedophile Thank you for reading this, i dislike services that accuse innocent

β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†2026-01-31
Ren

Lets use ai to flag people and then gaslight ourselves into believing the information is reliable. Avatar detection is absolutely insane LOL. My friend has perfectly sfw clothing and is being warned for having booty shorts??? they're pajama pants with Deer's on them, not even even close to being booty shorts. and another one of my friends is like completely grey with their torso being slightly greyer. "used to symbolize nakedness" ??? Salem Pedophile Trials. At this point I will not be surprised if innocent people get caught in this dilemma while actual predators roam free. Do better.

β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†2026-01-31
Lets Eat

This extension has the potential to be so great. That being said, it isn't. Any bio with an age in it gets someone flagged. I don't understand how this is a problem, especially with the new chat update. Outfit detection flags any avatar with skirts, dresses, crop tops, and those which are detailed. This extension also fails to account for those who joined one of these inappropriate servers but then realized what it was and immediately left. But when this happens, they are directed to the website's live chat, which is also not good. I understand that there probably isn't that many people working on the support, but oftentimes messages just never get a response. Please fix these problems and this extension can be much better.

β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†2026-01-30
Salem Luna

I can confirm all the reviews about support are true. It has been 9 days since a response, very unreliable even for a small team. This isn't a slow response issue, its a matter of them genuinely just ignoring any chat or email sent.

β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†2026-01-30
Kobe

bio checking seems a bit to sensitive, apart from that, pretty good extension.

β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†2026-01-27
abnormal player

There are a lot of flaws with this, starting with the absolute violation of privacy and ai that's as bad as roblox. Detection is extremely sensitive--one of things a 18 y/o friend got flagged for was a part of their bio where a user would be blocked if they lied about their age???? don't get me started on the avatars, apparently furries just don't exist. Along with that, the immediate assumption of things. This can also hurt people who add others, and hurts the people who are keeping things private and are actually normal outside. Out the ones doing it publicly, and are trying to make things publicly available. Also, it makes private things public, and could push more innocent people into a rabbit hole. Yes, I do believe that people should feel safe, in fact I have a little document that offers ideas for everyone and everything, but this is not it.

β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†2026-01-27
Jordan Ryan Heredia

Support is TERRIBLE. At this point its like they ignore their live chat

β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†2026-01-27
AdriaΓ±o

I don’t think this extension is fully reliable. It flagged several of my friends who are responsible adults, none of whom are in any condo-related Roblox servers. I even double checked with them and went through all their Discord servers. They’re not involved in anything the tool flags/suggests. Meanwhile, the extension missed others who arguably should be flagged. This makes me question how accurate the AI and human moderation really are. It seems the AI might automatically flag adult-only servers, even if they are completely safe (SFW), which leads to false positives. Human moderation is also not perfect, as we all know from platforms like Roblox and even real life law enforcement. Despite presenting clear evidence, the person who contacted me trusted the extension over actual facts and made baseless accusations about my friends. I personally checked my own profile, and I’m not flagged. This review isn’t out of frustration, but it’s from observing a tool that gives misleading results and can unfairly harm people’s reputations. If you plan to use this extension, don’t blindly trust the flags. Always verify with actual evidence, because mistakes happen and people can be wrongly accused. I used a discord app/bot tool called The All Seeing Eye to check my friend to see if she was in any flagged servers, lo and behold, the result literally said "This user has not been flagged in any servers." Please feel free to use it to check anyone that is automatically flagged by rotector by doing /check "userid". Overall, this extension may give a false sense of security. AI and human moderation can make errors, and relying on this tool without verification can cause real misunderstandings and unnecessary conflict among friends. If your goal is actually to find predators, the extension is not reliable. A better way to identify suspicious behavior is to pay attention to things like Ace of Spades symbols or Caesar ciphers in someone’s bio, which are more meaningful indicators than blindly trusting a flag from this tool.

β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†2026-01-26
uzi doorman

violation of privacy, and a broken extension. It put false mixed on multiple people without any proof and I've spoke to some who been mixed and in there on words "I've never joined one nor do I join any servers", and this isn't really saving people or helping roblox as some individuals who are innocent get caught in the crossfire who aren't bad. Plus this is probably made with ai or uses Ai, which Ai isn't really reliable in this time. Thats all I wanted to say

β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†2026-01-26
Sigismund

Support is laughable at best, replies can go past 72 hours without a response.

β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†2026-01-23
jyy

Outfit detection is overly sensitive and falsely flagged with the description "Sexual/Adult: Lingerie-styled outfit worn as regular clothing (white bra/bralette top with matching panties/briefs)" when ROBLOX actively bans "matching panties/briefs" and thus the reviewer/AI put a false claim on the flag.

β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†2026-01-21
Xero Rez

Flags any outfits that have dresses/skirts as "sexual fetish content".

β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†2026-01-16
Joel Fabian

good extension but the dev team just ignores appeals whether it be by their server, email or live chat and completely refuses to hear someone else's side of the argument even with proof

β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†2026-01-11
Raphiel

violation of privacy.

β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†2025-12-21
Sunfish

This extension collects and publicly displays Discord account IDs linked to Roblox profiles without user consent, which could allow strangers to contact users. It uses AI to label accounts based on group memberships, friend networks, and avatar outfits. These labels are frequently inaccurate or misleading, yet remain publicly visible, which can create harassment risks. The extension claims to offer an appeal process for labels, but multiple users have reported slow or non-existent responses. The developers cite having only 2-3 volunteers as the reason, which is insufficient for managing public data exposure. Users’ personal identifiers and reputations are exposed without reliable ways to correct mistakes. This raises serious privacy concerns and demonstrates that the AI labeling system is not dependable. I recommend caution before using this extension and that it be reviewed for privacy, accuracy, and user safety issues.

β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†2025-12-12
Luke Cam

This extension USED to be a good extension just days ago. Following the v2.8.0 update, it's become completely unusable for me, it's more buggy, takes more time to load and a lot of users that previously were flagged as dangerous or safe have suddenly had that indicator reset as if they were never scanned for seemingly no reason. I can't see a point in using the extension anymore because of this update.

β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†2025-11-26
Iggy

it doesnt work and im 100% sure this might be a password grabber

β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†2025-11-06
Lui

Only flags the most obvious bad actors. Predators that require nuanced review are skipped, most sneaky on platform aren't labeled. Not enough users, almost no one knows about this extension so human review is lacking.

β˜…β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†2026-03-12
Jon

im having problems with the application,i think is bugged or smth like a chosse the "DISAGREE" option and it just add/sum

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†β˜†2026-03-17
Pumpapastej Kola

I disagree

Permissions (2)

Permissions

notificationsβ„Ή Can show desktop notifications storageβ„Ή Can store data locally in your browser

Details

Version 2.15.0
Updated Mar 13, 2026
Size 891KiB
First Seen Mar 23, 2026